Polyethylene (PE) and Polypropylene (PP) are two of the most widely used thermoplastics in manufacturing, each with distinct molecular structures and material properties that significantly influence their processing behavior and end-use performance. Understanding their differences is critical for engineers and manufacturers to select the appropriate polymer that meets specific product requirements, cost targets, and sustainability goals.
Molecular Structure and Physical Properties
Polyethylene is a polymer made from repeating ethylene units (–CH2–CH2–), characterized by a relatively simple, linear or branched structure depending on the variant (LDPE, HDPE, LLDPE). This molecular configuration imparts flexibility, good impact resistance, and relatively low melting points ranging from 115°C to 135°C. The density of PE varies between 0.91 and 0.96 g/cm³, with HDPE being denser and more crystalline than LDPE.
Polypropylene, composed of propylene monomers (–CH2–CH(CH3)–), has a more complex molecular chain with a methyl group side branch, which increases its crystallinity and stiffness. Its melting point is higher, typically between 130°C and 171°C, providing enhanced thermal stability and superior chemical resistance compared to PE. The density of PP ranges from 0.90 to 0.91 g/cm³, slightly lower than HDPE but similar to LDPE.
Processing Characteristics and Manufacturing Techniques
Injection Molding
Both PE and PP are widely used in injection molding; however, PP's higher melting temperature allows for improved thermal resistance and dimensional stability post-molding. This makes PP a preferred choice for components requiring tight tolerances and resistance to warping. PE’s lower melting point translates to easier flow during molding but may limit its application in high-temperature environments.
押し出し
PE dominates extrusion processes, especially for producing films, sheets, pipes, and tubing. Its lower melting point and flexibility facilitate continuous extrusion and formation of thin films with excellent clarity (especially LDPE). PP can also be extruded but is generally preferred where rigidity and chemical resistance are prioritized, such as in producing robust sheets or profiles.
熱成形
PP’s rigidity and higher heat deflection temperature make it suitable for thermoforming applications, including trays, containers, and automotive interior parts. PE’s flexibility and softness limit its use in thermoformed parts requiring structural strength but favor its use in flexible packaging.
Mechanical and Chemical Performance
Polyethylene exhibits superior toughness and impact strength, especially in its low-density forms, making it ideal for products requiring durability and flexibility. However, it is more susceptible to UV degradation and chemical attack by certain solvents.
Polypropylene offers higher tensile strength, rigidity, and excellent resistance to a broad range of chemicals, including acids, bases, and organic solvents. PP also has better resistance to environmental stress cracking and UV radiation, extending its usability in outdoor and demanding industrial environments.
Applications by Industry
| Industry | Polyethylene (PE) | ポリプロピレン（PP） |
|---|---|---|
| パッケージ | Flexible films, bags, shrink wraps | Rigid containers, caps, reusable crates |
| Automotive | Fuel tanks, wiring insulation | Bumpers, dashboards, under-the-hood parts |
| 医学 | Disposable gloves, flexible tubing | Syringes, sterilizable medical devices |
| 消費財 | Toys, household goods, liners | Furniture parts, storage boxes |
Environmental and Economic Factors
From a sustainability perspective, both PE and PP are recyclable thermoplastics, but PE benefits from a more mature recycling infrastructure, particularly for HDPE containers. PP recycling is growing but is challenged by sorting complexities due to its similarity to other plastics.
Cost-wise, PE is generally less expensive to produce and process, benefiting from high-volume production and simpler polymerization. PP’s higher cost is offset by its superior performance characteristics in high-demand applications.
Summary and Material Selection Guidelines
Selecting between polyethylene and polypropylene hinges on balancing flexibility, chemical resistance, thermal performance, and cost.
- Choose Polyethylene for applications demanding flexibility, high impact resistance, ease of processing, and cost efficiency — particularly in packaging and consumer products.
- Choose Polypropylene for applications requiring rigidity, superior chemical resistance, higher heat tolerance, and structural stability — critical in automotive, medical, and industrial sectors.
By aligning the material choice with product performance requirements and manufacturing capabilities, manufacturers can optimize cost, durability, and sustainability outcomes.
What are the main differences between PE and PP?
PE is more flexible and chemical-resistant, while PP is tougher and more heat-resistant.
Which is better for high-temperature applications?
PP is better for high-temperature applications due to its higher melting point.
Which material is more chemically resistant?
PE offers better chemical resistance, especially against acids and bases.
Which is easier to 3D print, PE or PP?
PP is easier to 3D print, though both pose challenges like warping.
Which is more suitable for outdoor use?
PE is more suitable for outdoor use due to better UV and weather resistance.
Is PP or PE better for food packaging?
Both are food-safe, but PE is more commonly used in flexible packaging.
Which has better impact resistance?
PP generally has better impact resistance than PE, especially at room temperature.
Which material is more cost-effective?
PE is typically more cost-effective, especially in large-scale applications.
Can both PE and PP be used in injection molding?
Yes, both PE and PP are widely used in injection molding for various applications.
